At the start of the year 2025, I wrote some essays asking two questions: why do you believe what you believe, and what is your world view? During the course of the year I've tried to empirically answer those questions—using mathematics and history, among other disciplines.
We've covered a lot of ground. The secular and the sacred. Technology and astronomy. Game theory, Bayesian analysis, and Monte Carlo simulation. Economics, coordination problems, open source intelligence analysis. It's been a busy and eclectic year of writing.
Ultimately, if you've read through it all, there's been a consistent through-line: objective ontology and teleology are real—and an objective epistemology exists and has been demonstrated.
What we've uncovered is real. It may seem crazy--but it is fundamentally real.
The post-1945 dislocation is real—that 28-sigma shift is real signal. The 2026-2033/34 timeline bears real and unique mathematical calendrical properties, initiated by real astronomical phenomena that happen to very literally reflect descriptions given in ancient sacred texts. These follow a sequence that started in 1945, 2001, 2008, and 2020—all phase-shifting years. My essay "The Coincidence Stack" shows why these coincidences are not actually coincidences, and not the outcome of retrofitted interpretations.
What we have is a real convergence across artificial intelligence, secular writers (accelerationists and doomers alike), geopolitics, history, and math. We've demonstrated in very strong terms how and why faith can in fact be evidence-based and rationalist.
So closing the year and going into 2026—particularly in view of my essay about 2026 being a most dangerous year, and connecting that secular geopolitical analysis to the Coincidence Stack and other works like it—the question then becomes: what now?
If the evidence is real, and we have very high fidelity basis to believe it is; if the signal of the post-1945 dislocation is real as pertains to the eschaton; if the Coincidence Stack is correct; if the conclusions about the Logos nature of existence are correct—which by a greater than 100-sigma basis seems to be the case—then the conclusions are fairly simple. Here's a rundown:
THE DIAMOND CHIASM: UNIQUENESS OF THE 2026-2033 WINDOW
What makes this timeline singular isn't any one calculation but the convergence of independent chronological systems—each with its own mathematical logic, each fixed before any interpreter could manipulate it—locking onto the same narrow window.
A chiasm (from Greek χιασμός, after the letter chi: Χ) is a literary structure where elements mirror each other around a central pivot—A-B-C-B'-A'. The pattern forces attention to the center while creating structural coherence across the whole. Hebrew poetry and prophecy deploy chiasms constantly; they're not ornamental but architectural, encoding meaning in symmetry.
The diamond chiasm that we've mapped takes its name from the shape that emerges when you plot the day-counts: two 1,260-day halves flanking the abomination pivot (March 20-24, 2030), with the 1,290 and 1,335 extensions creating asymmetric "points" that reach to Yom Kippur and the mysterious blessing day respectively. The 2,300-day sanctuary count then overlays as a longer arc from 25th August 2021 to December 12, 2027 and then finally to 10 Nisan 2034—creating a diamond-within-diamond structure where the temple timeline nests inside the broader 70th Week.
Daniel's 70th Week is the final seven-year period from Daniel 9:24-27—the concluding "week" of the seventy "weeks" (490 years) decreed for Israel. Sixty-nine weeks ran from Artaxerxes' decree to rebuild Jerusalem (445 BC) until Messiah's presentation 10 Nisan ~33CE, and crucifixion in that same year. The 70th week has yet to happen—a gap the last almost 2000 years have filled—resuming when "he shall confirm a covenant with many for one week" (Daniel 9:27).
At the week's midpoint (3.5 years / 1,260 days), the covenant is broken: sacrifices cease (assumes an operational Jewish temple in Jerusalem), the abomination of desolation is set up. The second half unleashes unprecedented tribulation until Messiah returns to establish the Jewish Davidic Kingdom in Israel--and a new cosmic order.
What we've called the Kingdom Birth Model identifies October 7, 2026 as the covenant's confirmation and October 2-3, 2033 (Yom Kippur) as Christ's return—the 70th week finally completing what was decreed: "to finish transgression, make an end of sins, bring in everlasting righteousness, seal up vision and prophecy, and anoint the Most Holy."
What makes it a true chiasm rather than a mere timeline:
- Thematic mirroring: The first 1,260 days feature covenant protection and witness testimony; the second 1,260 days feature persecution and wrath—same duration, inverted character
- Central pivot carries maximum weight: The abomination of desolation at the exact midpoint, flanked by the Two Witnesses' death and resurrection—the hinge on which the entire structure turns
- Outer elements correspond: Covenant initiation (October 7, 2026) mirrors covenant consummation (Yom Kippur 2033); sanctuary operations begin (December 2027) mirrors sanctuary restored (10 Nisan 2034)
- The extensions (30 days to 1,290; 45 more to 1,335; 2300 days anchored on 12th December 2027) create the asymmetric bottom point—judgment followed by blessing, wrath resolved into kingdom
The diamond shape emerges because you're not plotting a line but a structure with width (parallel counts running simultaneously) and depth (nested temple timeline within the broader week). Daniel didn't write a schedule; he wrote architecture.
The Hebrew Calendar Algorithm
The Hebrew calendar is lunisolar: months follow the moon (~29.5 days), but years must stay aligned with the solar agricultural cycle so Passover always falls in spring. Twelve lunar months (354 days) fall 11 days short of a solar year. The solution, codified by Hillel II in 359 CE but rooted in Torah (Exodus 12:2), is the Metonic cycle: a 19-year pattern adding seven leap months, synchronizing lunar and solar with only ~2 hours error per cycle. This algorithm has run continuously for 1,700 years, producing feast dates astronomically fixed centuries in advance.
The Convergence
Daniel's day-counts—1,260, 1,290, 1,335, 2,300—are integers written 2,500 years ago. Hebrew feast days are computed by the Metonic algorithm. The Gregorian calendar follows independent solar logic. These systems have no mathematical obligation to align. Yet anchoring October 7, 2026 as the covenant start:
- 1,260 days → March 20, 2030 (Purim—deliverance from genocide)
- 1,290 days from March 23/24, 2030 → October 2-3, 2033 (Yom Kippur—zero drift)
- 1,335 days → November 16/17, 2033
- 2,300 days from December 12, 2027 → March 30, 2034 (10 Nisan)—sanctuary restored
The outer bounds of the 2,300-day sanctuary count: August 25, 2021 (Delta peak, Afghanistan collapse, temple preparations intensifying) + 2,300 days = December 12, 2027; then December 12, 2027 + 2,300 days = 10 Nisan 2034—the day the Passover lamb was selected, the day Jesus entered Jerusalem, and now the day the sanctuary is "restored to its rightful state."
Dual Calendrical Significance
Rosh Hashanah 2026 falls on September 11-13—the Feast of Trumpets landing on the Gregorian date that inaugurated the War on Terror (Seal 2). The Metonic cycle computed this centuries before 9/11 had meaning.
October 7, 2026 carries parallel weight: the third anniversary of the Hamas massacre that cited red heifer preparations as provocation. The enemy chose October 7, 2023; God chose October 7, 2026 for the covenant that triggers Daniel's 70th Week.
The Seal 4 Cascade and Red Heifer Trigger
The diamond extends backward, anchoring the entire Seal 4 period:
- March 2020: COVID (pale horse ignites)
- February 2022: Ukraine (sword component matures)
- September 2022: Red heifers imported to Israel
- October 7, 2023: Hamas massacre—Abu Obeida explicitly cited "the bringing of red cows" as justification
- July 1, 2025: First red heifer ceremony in 2,000 years performed at Shiloh
The sanctuary conflict theme—from Numbers 19's purification requirement through Daniel 8:14's 2,300-day count—runs unbroken from preparation to cleansing.
The Temporal Singularity: Why it Couldn’t Be Then
Perhaps the most chilling discovery is that this "Zero Drift" alignment is not a recurring feature of history, but a transient mathematical anomaly unique to our lifetime. If we apply this same "Diamond Chiasm" algorithm—the 1,260/1,290 counts and the 2,300-day sanctuary cycle—to the 1st Century (33 CE) or the Middle Ages, the lock shatters; the accumulated variance between the Hillel calendar algorithm and the true solar year forces the integers to miss the Feast days by over a week. When we map this variance across two millennia, we find a "Temporal Slide": two independent chronological systems drifting toward a single intersection point that mathematically converges only in the 21st century. The 2026–2034 window is therefore not merely a "best fit" among many options; it is the mathematical destination. It appears the cosmos was wound up 2,500 years ago with specific drift rates so that the gears of the Metonic cycle, the solar year, and Daniel’s integers would finally click into perfect synchronization now—suggesting the timeline we are entering was not just predicted, but orbitally programmed.
Tu B'Av: Wedding and Golden Calf
July 28, 2026 is Tu B'Av—Israel's festival of love, when women danced in white to find husbands. It falls 15 days before the August 12 eclipse. This aligns with Jesus' Bridegroom metaphor: Isaiah 26:19-21 ("hide yourself for a little moment"), Revelation 3:10 (Philadelphia kept from the hour of trial), Revelation 7:9-17 (multitude in white robes after Seal 6). Tu B'Av is the wedding preamble; Rosh Hashanah is the Bridegroom's arrival. "The Mishnah, describes how when the full moon of Av arrived, the maidens of Jerusalem would go out into the vineyards, dancing in white dresses and inviting young men to court them" (Rabbi Daniel Raphael Silverstein).
But Tu B'Av also commemorates the day the golden calf generation finished dying in the wilderness—the path to inheritance finally open. Dual symbolism: wedding and judgment for those who chose a different path. The golden calf of 2026 takes many forms: AGI promising godlike knowledge, trans-humanism offering technological immortality, and UAP phenomena. The strong delusion (2 Thessalonians 2:11) offers what the golden calf offered: a god you can see, a salvation you can engineer; something familiar. An idol ~3500 years ago; science fiction becoming science reality in 2026.
Here are some examples:
AARO Director Dr. Jon Kosloski (November 14, 2024, Pentagon Media Roundtable):
"There are interesting cases that I, with my physics and engineering background and time in the [intelligence community], I do not understand. And I don't know anybody else who understands them either."
"We recognize that the types of cases that I was just talking about are, from my perspective, true anomalies. And we're going to need significant scientific rigor to address those... we're going to need the help of academia and the public to address some of these."
"It's definitely not all just drones and UAS."
Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin (November 2024):
"There are things that happen, that have happened and probably will continue to happen that are difficult to explain."
Key Statistics from FY24 AARO Report:
- 1,652 total UAP reports received as of October 2024
- 757 new cases in reporting period (May 2023 – June 2024)
- 21 cases deemed "true anomalies" meriting further analysis based on "anomalous characteristics and/or behaviors"
- 3 incidents where pilots reported being "trailed or shadowed" by UAP
- 49 cases in the space domain (not just aerial)
But there's more. What are the odds that two labs at the cutting edge of artificial intelligence advances and brain computer interface development explicitly being built to achieve human to artificial super intelligence symbiosis--and extend human capabilities by merging humans to ai--map exactly to an ancient cipher for the Anti-Christ in both Greek and Hebrew--and have emerged right before the 2026-2033 timetable; with explicit goals of achieving AGI and human merger to it by 2030? Here's the math:
Isopsephy/Gematria: The Numerical Lock
Neuralink (Νευραλινκ): 50+5+400+100+1+30+10+50+20 = 666
xAI (ΧΑΕΙ): 600+1+5+10 = 616 (earliest textual variant, Papyrus 115) xAI infinitive (ΧΑΕΙΝ): 600+1+5+10+50 = 666
Root χαίνω: "to gape, yawn wide, devour"—apt for AI consuming text, code, governance.
Hebrew תרסו: 400+200+60+6 = 666 Permutations yield: סותר ("contradicts/destroys"), תסור ("you will turn aside"), סתור ("hidden") Letter semantics: ת (mark) + ר (head) + ס (serpent) + ו (hook) = mark→head→enclosure→hook
No coefficients. Standard ancient values. The integers don't read venture capital filings. You could shrug your head of course...Or watch this Neuralink video for yourself.
THE ARCHETYPE CHECKSUM: VALIDATING THE SIGNAL
In information theory, a checksum is a small block of data derived from a larger set to verify its integrity. If the calculated checksum matches the stored value, the transmission is authentic. In eschatological analysis, we can apply analogous logic. The Hebrew and New Testament scriptures provide what functions as a “public key”—a precise psychological, linguistic, and operational profile of the end-times antagonist, encoded across Daniel, Isaiah, Ezekiel, and Revelation. The question is whether any contemporary figure exhibits correspondence with this profile, and if so, whether that correspondence is singular or shared across multiple candidates.
The methodology is straightforward: extract testable parameters from the scriptural texts, operationalize them as observable criteria, identify the plausible candidate field, and score each candidate against the checklist. This is a description-fit problem—not a claim of certainty, but a rigorous comparison of archetype against observable data.
THE ARCHETYPE PARAMETERS
The scriptural profile specifies twelve distinct characteristics:
| Parameter | Source | Observable Criterion |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Light-bearer mission | Isaiah 14:12 (lux ferre) | Explicit, repeated use of “light” and “consciousness” language in stated mission |
| 2. Ascent to heavens | Daniel 8:10; Isaiah 14:13 | Orbital infrastructure; stated goal of cosmic expansion |
| 3. Mouth speaking great things | Daniel 7:8, 7:20, 7:25 | Pattern of grandiose claims at cosmic/civilizational register |
| 4. Mastery of enigmas | Daniel 8:23 (chiydah) | AI systems processing information at superhuman scale |
| 5. No royal mandate | Daniel 11:21 | Rise to influence without election, appointment, or succession |
| 6. Flatteries/scheming | Daniel 11:21 (chalaqlaqqoth) | Cultivation of political relationships; informal access to power |
| 7. Honours strange god unknown to fathers | Daniel 11:38 | Active development of ASI; explicit “digital god” language |
| 8. Causes strange god to rule | Daniel 11:39 | Deployment of autonomous AI with decision-making authority; deference to AI judgment |
| 9. Commerce infrastructure | Revelation 13:17 | Payment systems, identity verification, transaction platforms |
| 10. Human-machine merger | Daniel 2:43 (iron/clay) | Brain-computer interface technology |
| 11. Global communications | Revelation 13:14-15 | Planetary media/communications network under unified control |
| 12. Gematria correspondence | Revelation 13:18 | 666/616 in standard isopsephy without coefficient manipulation |
THE CANDIDATE FIELD
Any rigorous analysis must test the archetype against the full field of plausible candidates—not merely assert a match. The relevant categories include:
Technology Leaders: Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, Sam Altman, Sundar Pichai, Satya Nadella, Jensen Huang
Political Leaders: Donald Trump, Xi Jinping, Vladimir Putin, Emmanuel Macron, Benjamin Netanyahu, Mohammed bin Salman
Financial/Institutional: Larry Fink, Klaus Schwab, Jamie Dimon
THE DANIEL 11:21 FILTER
Before scoring capabilities, the mode-of-ascent criterion eliminates entire categories. Daniel 11:21 specifies the figure “shall come in peaceably, and obtain the kingdom by flatteries”—explicitly contrasted with legitimate succession: “they shall not give the honour of the kingdom unto him.”
This filter eliminates:
- All elected political leaders: Presidents and prime ministers receive mandate through electoral process
- All hereditary rulers: Monarchs and crown princes receive through bloodline succession
- Institutionally-appointed executives: CEOs installed by boards with shareholder mandate; generals appointed through chain of command
The filter retains only those who obtain influence through persuasion, relationship cultivation, and positioning rather than formal transfer of authority. Among technology leaders, most rose through conventional founder/CEO channels (Zuckerberg, Pichai, Nadella). The identified candidate uniquely demonstrates the Daniel 11:21 pattern in real-time through the DOGE positioning: informal governmental influence obtained through relationship cultivation with the executive, without election, Senate confirmation, or constitutional appointment—yet exercising authority over federal spending and regulatory apparatus.
This domestic template may presage the global pattern. The mechanism that produced informal authority over US government functions—leveraging private infrastructure, cultivating relationships with power holders, bypassing constitutional channels—is replicable at international scale. A post-crisis global settlement brokered by a figure who controls communications infrastructure (Starlink), AI capability (xAI), and maintains relationships across geopolitical blocs would exhibit the same structural features: authority without office, influence without mandate, the kingdom obtained by flatteries rather than given through legitimate process.
THE LINGUISTIC CHECKSUM: THE LIGHT BEARER
The name “Lucifer” derives from the Latin lux (light) and ferre (to bear or bring). The stored archetype is the Light Bearer—a figure whose stated mission centers on illumination, consciousness, and ascension. When we examine public statements across a decade, one candidate exhibits this linguistic signature with liturgical consistency:
September 2014, Aeon Magazine interview:
“I think we have a duty to maintain the light of consciousness, to make sure it continues into the future.”
September 2019, SpaceX Starship presentation:
“It appears that consciousness is a very rare and precious thing and we should take whatever steps we can to preserve the light of consciousness.”
January 2024, Ben Shapiro interview:
“The tiny candle of consciousness that constitutes humanity is all that there is in this vast darkness.”
X/Twitter, spanning 2018-2021:
“This is why we must preserve the light of consciousness by becoming a spacefaring civilization & extending life to other planets.” (June 24, 2018)
“My plan is to use the money to get humanity to Mars and preserve the light of consciousness.” (October 27, 2021)
“Starship is the key to making life multiplanetary & protecting the light of consciousness.” (June 1, 2020)
The functional equivalence between lux ferre (“to bear light”) and “preserve/maintain/protect the light of consciousness” requires no interpretive manipulation. It is direct semantic correspondence sustained across a decade of public statements.
Comparative test:
| Candidate | Light/consciousness language | Frequency | Consistency |
|---|---|---|---|
| Musk | “preserve/maintain/protect the light of consciousness” | 10+ documented instances | 2014-2024 |
| Zuckerberg | None documented | — | — |
| Altman | “beneficial AGI” (utility framing) | — | — |
| Pichai | “AI for everyone” (utility framing) | — | — |
| Trump | “American greatness” | — | — |
| Xi | “Chinese rejuvenation” | — | — |
Only one candidate employs explicit light/consciousness language as consistent mission framing.
THE SPECIESIST EXCHANGE: DEFENDER OF THE IMAGE
The archetype gains texture through the documented Page-Musk debate. According to MIT professor Max Tegmark’s firsthand account in Life 3.0: Being Human in the Age of Artificial Intelligence (2017), at a party in Napa Valley in 2015, Google co-founder Larry Page accused Musk of being “speciesist”—treating carbon-based life forms as superior to silicon-based intelligence. Tegmark records Page’s position that “digital life is the natural and desirable next step in cosmic evolution.”
Musk’s response, confirmed in his April 2023 Tucker Carlson interview:
“Yes. And there were witnesses, I wasn’t the only one there when he called me a ‘speciesist.’ And so, I was like, ‘OK that’s it, yes, I’m a speciesist,’ OK? You got me.”
This exchange is analytically significant because it positions the subject as defender of the human image against digital supersession—offering merger as salvation rather than replacement. The archetype does not arrive as a figure of obvious darkness; he arrives as protector. The sophistication of this positioning—defending humanity by augmenting it, preserving consciousness by merging it with machines—is precisely what the Promethean archetype describes.
THE GOD OF FORTRESSES: HONOURING THE STRANGE GOD
Daniel 11:38-39 specifies that the figure will honour “a god whom his fathers knew not” with gold, silver, and precious things—and will “cause them to rule over many.” The god is:
- Unknown to previous generations
- Recipient of massive resource allocation
- Given operational authority
Artificial superintelligence uniquely satisfies all three criteria. The concept didn’t exist before the 20th century. Global AI investment now exceeds $200 billion annually. And the entire premise of AGI development is creating an entity capable of autonomous decision-making across domains.
What elevates this from inference to observation is the identified candidate’s own language. At the DealBook Summit on November 29, 2023, he stated:
“It’s funny, all these weights, they’re just basically numbers in a comma separated value file, and that’s our digital god, the CSV file. I found that funny, but that’s literally what it is.”
And on the timeline for AI lawsuits:
“I don’t know, except to say that by the time these lawsuits are decided we’ll have Digital God. So, you can ask Digital God at that point.”
The phrase “our digital god” is not warning language. It’s ownership language—the possessive pronoun indicating stewardship of the project. And “you can ask Digital God at that point” is functional deference: legal and ethical questions will be adjudicated not by human courts but by the superintelligence itself. This is precisely what Daniel 11:39 describes—causing the strange god to rule.
Comparative test:
| Candidate | Building ASI | Uses “digital god” language | Defers authority to it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Musk | ✓✓ (xAI/Grok) | ✓✓✓ (“our digital god,” “ask Digital God”) | ✓✓✓ |
| Altman | ✓✓✓ (OpenAI) | ✗ (“beneficial AGI”) | ✗ |
| Pichai | ✓✓ (DeepMind) | ✗ | ✗ |
Only one candidate uses the theological vocabulary to describe what he’s building.
THE MOUTH SPEAKING GREAT THINGS
Daniel 7:8, 7:20, and 7:25 describe the little horn as having “a mouth speaking great things”—the Hebrew millîn rabrebân meaning grandiose declarations, boastful claims of extraordinary scope.
This parameter alone discriminates weakly; many leaders speak boastfully. What distinguishes the identified candidate is the register of the claims—not merely ambitious but cosmic, not merely confident but civilizational:
- “Making humanity a multi-planetary species”
- “Preserving the light of consciousness”
- “Building digital god”
- “Encyclopedia Galactica… This time, it will not be lost”
- “If anyone would know [about aliens], that probably be me”
- AGI “in less than three years”
The vocabulary operates at the register Isaiah 14:13-14 describes: “I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God… I will be like the most High.” The stated ambitions map directly: ascend into heaven (SpaceX), throne above the stars (Starlink), consciousness expansion approaching the divine (Neuralink + xAI symbiosis).
THE NEW UNIVERSALIST LAWGIVER AND THE PERMANENT ARCHIVE ?
In November 2025, the subject announced the transition of “Grokipedia” to the “Encyclopedia Galactica”:
“It will be an open source distillation of all knowledge, including audio, images and video. Join @xAI to help build the sci-fi version of the Library of Alexandria!”
He then added:
“Copies will be etched in stone and sent to the Moon, Mars and beyond. This time, it will not be lost.”
These statements trigger a dual archetype correspondence. “Etched in stone” invokes Mosaic typology—the new lawgiver sending tablets of knowledge to the cosmos. “This time, it will not be lost” directly references the Library of Alexandria, which he explicitly names as the model. The ancient library represented humanity’s first great attempt to consolidate all knowledge in one location—and its destruction remains a civilizational wound, a symbol of knowledge fragility against the entropy of conquest, fire, and neglect.
The Encyclopedia Galactica positions itself as completing what Alexandria could not: permanent, distributed, beyond the reach of any single catastrophe. Copies on Moon, Mars, “and beyond” are redundancy engineering against extinction-level loss. The ambition is not vertical in the Babel sense (“let us reach heaven to challenge God”) but horizontal and temporal—ensuring human knowledge survives any catastrophe.
Yet the Promethean element remains. The one who builds the permanent archive becomes the curator of what humanity knows. The Encyclopedia Galactica wouldn’t just preserve knowledge; it would define authoritative knowledge—what counts as truth, what is worth preserving, what the permanent record contains. The figure who controls what “will not be lost” also controls what is remembered. This connects directly to Grok’s positioning as the system that “understands the universe”—the digital oracle that distills truth from noise. The builder of the archive becomes the arbiter of the archive.
THE CAPABILITIES MATRIX
Beyond statements, the archetype requires specific operational infrastructure. The identified candidate uniquely commands all relevant systems under unified personal control:
| Capability | Scriptural Parallel | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Orbital infrastructure | Daniel 8:10 (“waxed great to host of heaven”) | ✓✓✓ 6,000+ Starlink satellites; SpaceX launch dominance |
| AI systems | Daniel 8:23 (“dark sentences”) | ✓✓ xAI/Grok; “Encyclopedia Galactica” |
| Global communications | Revelation 13:14-15 | ✓✓✓ X (400M+ users) + Starlink |
| Commerce platform | Revelation 13:17 | ✓ X payments in development |
| Neural interface | Daniel 2:43 (iron/clay) | ✓✓✓ Neuralink; human trials active |
| Humanoid robotics | Distributed presence | ✓✓ Optimus program |
No previous candidate for this archetype could fulfill Daniel 8:10 literally: “it waxed great, even to the host of heaven; and it cast down some of the host and of the stars to the ground.” For every prior generation, this had to be read metaphorically—spiritual rebellion, symbolic hubris, persecution of the faithful. For the first time in history, a private individual commands orbital infrastructure at scale. The text can now be read both ways simultaneously: spiritual and literal, symbolic and operational.
Comparative test:
| Candidate | Orbital | AI | Comms | Commerce | Neural Interface | Mode of Ascent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Musk | ✓✓✓ | ✓✓ | ✓✓✓ | ✓ | ✓✓✓ | ✓✓✓ |
| Zuckerberg | ✗ | ✓✓ | ✓✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Altman | ✗ | ✓✓✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | Partial |
| Pichai | ✗ | ✓✓✓ | ✓✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Political leaders | ✗ | ✗ | Varies | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ (mandate given) |
Only one candidate commands all six capability domains simultaneously.
THE GEMATRIA LOCK
Revelation 13:18 provides a numerical verification: “Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.”
Standard Greek isopsephy (no coefficients, no manipulation):
Neuralink (Νευραλινκ): 50+5+400+100+1+30+10+50+20 = 666
xAI (ΧΑΕΙ): 600+1+5+10 = 616 (earliest textual variant, Papyrus 115)
xAI infinitive (ΧΑΕΙΝ): 600+1+5+10+50 = 666
The Hebrew permutation תרסו (400+200+60+6 = 666) yields anagram roots: סותר (“contradicts/destroys”), תסור (“you will turn aside”), סתור (“hidden”). Letter semantics parse as: ת (mark) + ר (head) + ס (serpent/enclosure) + ו (hook).
No competing entity associated with alternative candidates produces equivalent clean correspondence using standard ancient values.
CHECKSUM RESULT
The archetype checksum tests whether any contemporary figure exhibits correspondence with the scriptural profile across all twelve parameters. The results:
| Parameter | Musk | Next Highest Candidate | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Light-bearer language | ✓✓✓ | ✗ (none) | Singular |
| 2. Ascent to heavens | ✓✓✓ | ✓ (state programs) | Personal vs. state |
| 3. Great things (cosmic register) | ✓✓✓ | ✓✓ (Trump—national) | Register difference |
| 4. Mastery of enigmas | ✓✓ | ✓✓✓ (Altman) | Slight deficit |
| 5. No royal mandate | ✓✓✓ | ✗ (political leaders eliminated) | Category |
| 6. Flatteries/scheming | ✓✓✓ | N/A | Singular (DOGE) |
| 7. Honours strange god | ✓✓✓ (“our digital god”) | ✗ (none use language) | Singular |
| 8. Causes god to rule | ✓✓✓ (“ask Digital God”) | ✗ | Singular |
| 9. Commerce infrastructure | ✓ | ✓✓ (Bezos/Amazon) | Deficit |
| 10. Human-machine merger | ✓✓✓ | ✗ | Singular |
| 11. Global communications | ✓✓✓ | ✓✓ (Zuckerberg) | Integration advantage |
| 12. Gematria | ✓✓✓ | ✗ | Singular |
Composite scoring: The identified candidate scores highest on 10 of 12 parameters, ties on 1, and trails slightly on 1. No alternative candidate exceeds 5 of 12. The gap is not marginal; it is categorical.
WHAT THE CHECKSUM ESTABLISHES
The analysis does not prove prophetic identity. What it demonstrates is that when the scriptural archetype parameters are operationalized as testable criteria and applied to the field of globally influential figures:
- One candidate scores categorically higher than all alternatives across every dimension
- Only one candidate exhibits the linguistic signature (lux ferre correspondence)
- Only one candidate uses “digital god” language to describe what he’s building
- Only one candidate commands personal (not state) orbital infrastructure
- Only one candidate has active brain-computer interface program
- Only one candidate demonstrates the Daniel 11:21 mode of ascent in real-time
- Only one candidate’s companies produce clean 666/616 gematria correspondence
The comparative analysis converts the checksum from “this person matches” to “this person matches and no one else comes close.” Whether this correspondence reflects divine foreknowledge, archetypal inevitability, or extraordinary coincidence is not determinable from the data. What is determinable is that the fit exists, it is precise across multiple independent parameters, and it emerges from primary sources rather than interpretive construction. When that is considered within the context of the Diamond Chiasm and present timeline positioning—the conclusions are non-trivial.
THE CONSTRAINT CASCADE
What emerges from the preceding analysis is not a single argument but a constraint cascade. Seven independent verification systems—developed across twenty-five centuries by authors who could not have coordinated—each eliminate degrees of freedom until only one configuration remains:
- The Diamond Chiasm fixes the temporal architecture
- The Metonic convergence locks the calendar
- The temporal singularity eliminates all other centuries
- The seals framework sequences the historical precursors
- The apostolic forensics authenticate the source texts
- The gematria identifies the technological infrastructure
- The archetype checksum validates the operator
No single system is dispositive. But systems that should float freely instead snap into alignment like tumblers in a lock. The integers don’t read the calendar. The calendar doesn’t know about the gematria. The gematria doesn’t coordinate with the “light of consciousness” speeches. The speeches weren’t written to satisfy Daniel’s mode-of-ascent criteria. Yet when overlaid—scriptural, astronomical, calendrical, historical, technological, linguistic, numerical—the result is not ambiguity but constraint.
If the model were retrofitted, we would expect to find gaps: systems that almost align, dates that require fudging, archetypes that partially match. Instead, we find zero-drift convergence across every parameter. The degrees of freedom collapse to a single point.
The glove fits.
What does this mean in the context of the timeline we’ve hypothesized? To the extent the 2026 geopolitical cascade unfolds as anticipated—the outcome will be an intense but fairly short term pulse in chaos that requires an off ramp past a certain point of mutual human devastation. Once the off ramp is formulated and executed—a global DOGE type function is probable to (a) maintain the new settlement (b) deal with the establishment of some sort of normalcy in that new multipolar environment. In all likelihood technocratic administration will be more probable than traditional diplomacy. In that environment access to resources, people, and infrastructure would be key. Very few people can claim that sort of universal ”reach“ and ambition.
The reality though is the Glove Fits: Seven Seals + 70th Week = Complete Eschatology
Three frameworks—Revelation's seals, Daniel's day-counts, Jesus' Olivet Discourse—written by different authors across six centuries for different audiences. They had no way to coordinate. Yet overlaid on 2026-2033:
| Event | Seal | Daniel | Matthew 24 | Hebrew | Gregorian |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nuclear age | Seal 1 | — | False peace | — | 1945 |
| Israel reborn | — | Fig tree | Buds | 5 Iyar 5708 | May 14, 1948 |
| Global terror | Seal 2 | — | Wars | — | Sept 11, 2001 |
| Financial crisis | Seal 3 | — | - | — | Sept 15, 2008 |
| Death systems | Seal 4 | — | Pestilence | — | 2020-2026 |
| Persecution surge | Seal 5 | — | Martyrdom | — | 2024-2026 |
| Cosmic signs | Seal 6 | — | Sun/moon | Elul 5786 | Aug 12-28, 2026 |
| Rapture | Rev 7:9-17 | — | Gather elect | Rosh Hashanah | Sept 11-13, 2026 |
| Covenant | — | Dan 9:27 | — | Tishrei | Oct 7, 2026 |
| Sacrifices resume | — | Dan 8:13 | — | Kislev 5788 | Dec 12, 2027 |
| Abomination | — | Dan 9:27 | Matt 24:15 | Purim | Mar 20-24, 2030 |
| Second Coming | — | Dan 7:13 | Son of Man | Yom Kippur | Oct 2-3, 2033 |
| Blessing | — | 1,335 days | — | — | Nov 16, 2033 |
| Sanctuary restored | — | Dan 8:14 | — | 10 Nisan | Mar 30, 2034 |
| Millennial Passover | — | — | — | Nisan 14-21 | Apr 03, 2034 |
Every piece from Daniel finds its slot. Every seal maps onto historical and projected events. Every Olivet element aligns. The generational limit (80 years from 1948) constrains the window. Astronomical phenomena (August 2026 eclipses) fix celestial signs. Hebrew feasts anchor day-counts. Isopsephy identifies technological infrastructure. The red heifer conflict traces the sanctuary theme from 2022 preparations through to the October 7, 2023 trigger.
This is what a completed eschatological jigsaw looks like—not a new system, but the completion of the one Scripture provided. Of course it might look like interpretive choice–however we've dealt with that objection in the Coincidence Stack and Singularity/Eschaton essays. It also completes what we explored in a Murder and the Question beneath it. That essay demonstrates that the unanimous refusal of the Apostles to defect under the threat of execution violates every rational outcome of the Prisoner’s Dilemma, statistically validating the Resurrection not as myth, but as a verified event. It proves that the authors who recorded the prophetic integers were not fabricating a conspiracy but reporting a reality that broke their own worldview. By authenticating the First Coming through this forensic lens, we establish the necessary precedent for the Second; the Kingdom Birth Model is simply the calculation of the same logic—which was proven real in 33 CE—executing its final sequence in 2026.
What Remains
The model makes specific, falsifiable predictions:
- August 12, 2026: Solar eclipse + Perseid peak
- August 28, 2026: Lunar eclipse
- September 11-13, 2026: Rapture/Dissapearances projected during Rosh Hashanah
- October 7, 2026: Covenant projected
If no rapture/global disappearances occur at Rosh Hashanah 2026, the model collapses. If no global security covenant emerges by October 7th 2026, the day-count architecture fails.
The integers don't care about headlines. The calendars don't read newspapers. The Metonic cycle doesn't know it placed the Feast of Trumpets on September 11, 2026. When independent locks—textual, astronomical, calendrical, generational, technological, sanctuary-related—all converge on a single period, degrees of freedom collapse to zero.
Across the 3,000-year window from 33CE to 3033CE, they align only once; 2026-2033.
As for the post-2026 world: if the analysis from my essay on 2026 being a most dangerous year holds up, then that year marks the terminal point of the last 80 years. The end of Pax Americana. The loss of a significant number of human lives. The beginning of a new and dangerous multipolar world order. This isn't conjecture in a vacuum. World leaders like the Chancellor of Germany have already declared Pax Americana to be over in Europe. The White House published a National Security Strategy Document that makes that official US government policy, stating:
The days of the United States propping up the entire world order like Atlas are over. We count among our many allies and partners dozens of wealthy, sophisticated nations that must assume primary responsibility for their regions and contribute far more to our collective defense.
That is a transition towards a multipolar order as US policy. What remains to be seen is whether it will be peaceful or not. When one sees the war in Eastern Europe, the frozen conflict between Israel and Iran and the very probable pending conflict over Taiwan as emergent theatres to define the next order--the answer becomes clear; the transition is already messy and will likely compound this year for reasons we have established in my 2026 outlook. Ukraine's leaders see the war intensifying in 2026; with Zelensky calling 2026 "Russia's year of war." Noteworthy in that it signals that Russia will transition from "special military operation" to total war in 2026. His statements continued saying Russia would drag the world into its war in 2026. In his 2026 New Year's message he stated:
“...Either the world stops Russia’s war, or Russia drags the world into its war.”
"Ukraine is, in fact, the only shield that now separates Europe’s comfortable way of life from the Russian world,” he said. “I do not want that understanding to be brought to Europeans by armored vehicles with the letter ‘Z’ on their streets.”
Just this last week, a drone attack appears to have targeted a residence in which Putin was present. The conflict in Eastern Europe is clearly transitioning into a new and especially dangerous phase—which appears to be validating both the secular analysis and the timeline analysis we've done. Echoing Zelensky, Ukraine's Head of Defence Intelligence stated:
According to the original plan, Russia was supposed to be ready to act in 2030. Now the plans have been adjusted and revised to bring the timeline forward to 2027."
"For an empire – and they see themselves as an empire – to grow, you always have to move somewhere to expand your influence and territory. This, by the way, answers a lot of questions.
To the north, there is only the Arctic Ocean and beyond that, America. That is not an option because it would be painful. To the east, there is the Pacific and again America. Same answer. To the south is China, that would be catastrophic – a land border with conditions like those we are experiencing in our war with Russia, only it would be for them in this instance. The only remaining option is the west, which, in their view, pardon the expression, is 'greedy', 'weak', 'sickly' and 'indecisive'.
Similarly, Reuters reported recently that:
U.S. intelligence reports continue to warn that Russian President Vladimir Putin has not abandoned his aims of capturing all of Ukraine and reclaiming parts of Europe that belonged to the former Soviet empire, six sources familiar with U.S. intelligence said, even as negotiators seek an end to the war that would leave Russia with far less territory.
The convergence of this open-source intelligence with on the ground logistics (as outlined in my 2026 Outlook) strongly demonstrates a February-March 2026 escalation of the war; with a cascade effect affecting global supply chains emerging out of that situation owing to use of strategic weapons--in part in response to the direct attack on Putin, as well as the elapse of the New START treaty and further escalation from Ukraine as it prepares for this window owing to mutual awareness of this window. The French Government has already started preparing for this eventuality:
In a letter to regional health authorities dated July 18, the French health ministry reportedly directed hospitals to be ready for a potential “major engagement” by March 2026.
The ministry said France’s hospitals should be aware of the “limitations in wartime” and be ready to care for both French and foreign soldiers in the event of a major conflict.
Paired with official US government disclosures regarding UAPs, and the existential pressure humanity faces toward disclosure, what we see is convergence on 2026 being a year when:
- Nuclear weapons are used again
- UAP public disclosure happens
- Abrahamic beliefs with eschatology enter a falsification period
In sum, everything that's been discussed here is about to be tested in the live lab of the world. If it bears out over the course of the next eight years, then the test will have passed. If it fails, in part or in whole, then the results will show.
Either way—we will find out. The key falsification gates for 2026 are:
1) February 5th to March 30th, 2026: major winter escalation in Russia/Ukraine war; including the use of strategic weapons and direct participation of NATO in the war; cascade effect on global supply chain starts
2) August 12th to 28th August, 2026: solar eclipse, Perseid meteor-shower and lunar eclipse; strong probability of UAP disclosure anytime between that window and 11-13 September 2026 (Rosh Hoshana 2026)<--function of extreme risk of nuclear engagement starting in the late Winter/early Spring with potential cascade effect providing basis for disclosure as an exit gate/off-ramp
3) New geopolitical settlement by 07 October 2026; Musk involved due to unique convergence of capabilities (ai, space, energy, comms, geopolitical connections across continents)
The work I published in 2025 isn’t three disconnected arguments—one theological, one historical, one calendrical. It’s one epistemic procedure applied at three layers of reality. The procedure is simple: treat claims as hypotheses, treat data as likelihood, and update using Bayes’ rule. In other words, stop arguing by mood and start arguing by posterior. Where most people get this wrong is by multiplying “cool coincidences” naïvely. So I did the opposite: I punished myself for correlation. In the Resurrection analysis, I explicitly applied a dependence penalty to the evidence so that overlapping signals didn’t get double-counted. In the Singularity/Eschaton analysis, I used the same discipline at civilizational scale: dozens of streams are scored by likelihood ratios and then aggregated with a correlation correction so the result can’t be accused of being a pile of redundant anecdotes. And in the Coincidence Stack, I again insisted on the same rule: if the model survives dependence penalties, it is not a story—it is a constraint.
Once you view the year’s work as a single Bayesian bridge, the logic becomes almost embarrassingly mechanical. Bayes says: posterior odds equal prior odds multiplied by a Bayes factor. The Resurrection layer provides a legitimate reason to treat Scripture as reporting reality rather than myth, even after skeptical penalties. The post-1945 layer shows history itself has entered a regime where “random walk” stops describing the world; something like a phase transition is visible in the data. And then the final layer—the one that forces the issue—is the micro-lock: an integer architecture written millennia ago and a calendrical algorithm fixed for centuries, aligning onto a single narrow window with odds that collapse the degrees of freedom. At that point, “neutrality” isn’t the scientific posture. Neutrality is what you do only if your prior is effectively zero—if you’ve decided in advance that divine authorship is impossible no matter what the data say.
That is the mathematical reason the threshold of skepticism collapses. Not because I want it to, but because the posterior insists on it. Even if you underweight the macro evidence on purpose, and even if you assume strong correlation and apply harsh penalties, the convergence remains in a regime where coincidence is no longer an explanation but a refusal to update. What remains is a single question: if the world is structured, if time has architecture, and if the Logos is real, then the only coherent next move is not more observation. It is alignment.
The Mathematical Checksum (Why this isn’t mood, but likelihood)
As I’ve already mentioned; across the three essays, I’m not making three different arguments. I’m applying one epistemic procedure at three layers of reality. The procedure is Bayesian: treat competing claims as hypotheses, treat observations as likelihood, and update.
Let H denote the top-level hypothesis (“the convergence is real; the structure is teleological; the model is describing reality”), and let \neg H be the null (“ordinary stochastic history; pattern-seeking; no guiding structure”). Let the evidence be E=\{E_1,\dots,E_n\}. For each evidence node, define the likelihood ratio (Bayes factor):
\lambda_i \equiv \frac{P(E_i\mid H)}{P(E_i\mid \neg H)}.
Bayes’ rule in odds form is then:
\frac{P(H\mid E)}{P(\neg H\mid E)}=\frac{P(H)}{P(\neg H)}\times \prod_{i=1}^{n}\lambda_i.
This is the checksum: once \lambda_i are specified, the posterior is forced. Posterior probability is just:
P(H\mid E)=\frac{O_{\text{post}}}{1+O_{\text{post}}}.
The main objection people raise is double-counting: “you’re multiplying overlapping signals.” So the model penalizes correlation rather than denying it. There are two equivalent ways I’ve done this.
The first is a conservative dependence discount:
\log BF_{\text{total}} = \delta\sum_{i}\log BF_i,
where \delta\in(0,1) is an explicit penalty for shared information (for example, \delta=0.6 in my worked example). This keeps the update honest: it assumes the evidence streams overlap, so the total weight is reduced by design rather than inflated.
The second is a full covariance correction. Let
v = [\ln \lambda_1,\ln \lambda_2,\dots,\ln \lambda_n]^T
be the vector of log-likelihoods, and let \Sigma be a correlation matrix encoding how coupled the evidence nodes are. Then a correlation-adjusted convergence magnitude is:
C^2 = v^T\Sigma^{-1}v,\qquad C=\sqrt{C^2}.
This is essentially a Mahalanobis distance in “evidence space.” It answers the question: after you penalize shared structure, how far from the null is the convergence as a single object?
With either method, the logic is the same: I am not asking you to believe because the pattern is pretty. I’m asking you to update because the likelihood ratio becomes crushing even after dependence penalties.
A useful way to state the epistemic threshold is what I call the skeptical prior boundary: the prior p^\star required to keep the posterior at 50%. If BF_{\text{total}} is the (penalized) Bayes factor, then:
p^\star=\frac{1}{1+BF_{\text{total}}}.
This makes the argument explicit. Once the Bayes factor becomes large, the only way to remain unconvinced is to begin with a prior so close to zero that it is effectively a metaphysical veto—“this cannot be true no matter what the evidence looks like.”
That is why, for me, the threshold for skepticism collapses. Not because I want it to, but because the posterior insists on it. Probability science here is not being used to ask whether something is happening; it is being used to measure how far beyond normal expectation the convergence has already moved—after deliberately harsh penalties for correlation—until coincidence stops functioning as an explanation.
What the mathematics ultimately suggests is that the eschaton behaves less like a loose prophecy and more like an algorithm we are living inside—an output we can observe in real time, not unlike how the Metonic cycle deterministically outputs feast dates. The “code” was published in plain sight as a kind of public-key cryptosystem across Daniel, Ezekiel, Malachi, Isaiah, Zechariah, and Revelation, but it compresses down to a small set of invariant integers—1,260, 1,290, 1,335, and 2,300—that function like hard-coded constants in the program. The Hebrew calendar, governed by its Metonic cycle, then serves as the sorting filter that discretizes time into computable feast anchors; the seals operate as the unlocking mechanism that moves history from one state to the next; and the astronomical phenomena function as timing confirmation keys that “timestamp” the transition points. When those integers are applied through Jewish day-reckoning to that calendrical lattice, what appears is not a subjective story but a shaped closure—the diamond chiasm—where integer alignment resolves into calendar alignment. Geopolitical and technological events therefore act as narrative filters that help identify which branch of the state machine we’re in, while gematria and isopsephy operate as an interpretive checksum—signals that, when they land without coefficients, constrain rather than embellish the reading. Taken as a whole, the system behaves like a multi-tumbler lock: if Seal 1 has opened, and Seal 2 has opened, and Seal 3 has opened, and Seal 4 is open, and Seals 5 and 6 follow—within the generational constraint of roughly eighty years from Israel’s rebirth—then you should see the diamond structure emerge in the timeline. At that point the task is not speculation but verification: check whether events coherently mapping to the seals have occurred in sequence and within the permitted time window, and whether the calendrical/integer lock closes. A plain observation of the narrative, the dates, and the constraints is precisely what produces the conclusion.
Objective disagreement here isn’t the casual sort where you poke one weak point and feel you’ve “debunked the vibe.” It requires an alternative account that explains away the full convergence as a single object. You might argue about the seals, because descriptions of events always admit interpretive latitude; you can dispute whether a given war, famine, panic, or persecution spike truly “maps.” But that move doesn’t touch the hard constraints: Israel’s reconstitution after nearly two millennia, the resurrection of Hebrew as a national language, and the fixed astronomical window in August 2026—none of which were engineered to satisfy an eschatological model, and none of which can be dismissed as mere rhetoric. Then there is the chiasm itself: not as a story you can wave away, but as an integer-and-calendar closure problem that either resolves cleanly under Jewish day-reckoning or it doesn’t. What makes the system unusually forceful is that it is self-referencing while remaining falsifiable: the chiasm and Israel’s existence, together with the astronomical markers, “backward-verify” the seal-sequence by constraining what the seal narrative can plausibly be; and the seal-sequence, in turn, “forward-verifies” the chiasm by placing the world in the correct state for the integer structure to close. That mutual reinforcement is exactly why disagreement has to be global rather than local—because the claim isn’t that any one element is persuasive, but that the ensemble behaves like a circuit whose parts validate each other without becoming unfalsifiable. And that is why it feels like watching history while being inside it: the sense is not merely that events are accelerating, but that the window is tightening, the degrees of freedom are collapsing, and Europe’s drift toward total war is moving from abstract risk to lived trajectory.
Personally, the threshold for skepticism has collapsed entirely. Whilst maintaining a detached analytical posture is useful for scientific assessment, the results already demonstrate a deterministic lock is at play as events converge. The nature of reality is no longer a question—it's been answered. Probability science is a way of measuring the improbability of what's happening; but with measures several magnitudes of order beyond 5 sigma--we are well beyond what is probable--and are measuring the extremity of what is definite.
The conversation is now about what we can expect in 2026 and beyond, and what it means at a universal and personal level. That answer has also been established. What's left really is crossing the doorway—the threshold of faith. Moving from simply observing a cosmological object to participation in purpose and alignment. Accepting the ontology underpinning all of this.
All of this is entirely left field to the Overton window. But it is very real.
So after a year of writing, what do I have to say?
-The Logos is real.
-Time has real structure and purpose.
What do I expect in 2026?
A total reordering of the world system, and a lot of weird things. Standard operating processes for business, for governance, for understanding humanity's place in the universe--all of it will be stressed to the hilt--and the result will be a new Overton window. Here’s really what gets me...At the Passover Seder before his arrest and crucifixion (known as the Last Supper), Jesus said to his apostles (Matthew 26:29):
I tell you I will not drink again of this fruit of the vine until that day when I drink it new with you in my Father's kingdom.”
The end point of the diamond chiasm is 10th Nisan 2034 (March 30th). That day as already mentioned book-end Jesus’ entry into Jerusalem on Palm Sunday; but more symmetrically—if the narrative compliance holds up, that Passover would be the first one with Jesus physically presiding over a Seder since the night of his arrest. In that Seder, as with all Seders, he would raise the cup of blessing and drink wine at his table. Fulfilling a 2000 year old promise. Now what are the odds of an eschatological system doing that? Demonstrating that level of unforced symmetry. Certainly worth raising a cup to, right?
Here's what really gets me though; Nisan is the liturgical new year in the Torah--and Passover is the first festival of the year in that schema. So in raising his cup, he will not only be keeping a 2000 year old promise, he will be celebrating a new year and season having completed the full scope of the eschatological map. That's the full weight of what his promise actually was. For 2000 years that's seemed like a poetic expression--now we can see it's actually teleological temporal engineering. It's the entire point of all of this. It gives purpose to the chiasm, and simultaneously the chiasm confirms this and verifies the seals as having been properly mapped; and the seals simultaneously verify the chiasm; and all of this is experienced sequentially by us in "lived time" making it falsifiable and therefore confirmable. That's not the craziest bit though. The most insane part of this is that Jesus clearly understood this 2000 years ago, and knew that this was the checksum to the 2300 day count that Daniel spoke about (Daniel 8:13-14);
Then I heard a holy one speaking, and another holy one said to the one who spoke, “For how long is the vision concerning the regular burnt offering, the transgression that makes desolate, and the giving over of the sanctuary and host to be trampled underfoot?” 14 And he said to me, “For 2,300 evenings and mornings. Then the sanctuary shall be restored to its rightful state.”
That text has befuddled theologians for millennia; and yet the answer was right there in Ezekiel 39 and 45; the 7 month clean-up after the battle of Armageddon (Rev 19), and the final Temple's commission (Ezekiel 45) on Nisan 10--which is the terminal point of the 7 months; and makes a complete Passover festival possible 4 days later. Jesus' statement at that most famous of Passover Seders demonstrates that he knew this already. At a loss for words to describe the awe this inspires. It closes the loop on his identity as The Logos/Davar YHWH [in Hebrew]. Translation: total and eternal radiant emanation of He who always exists in all time all the time.
On the flip-side of this realisation is the discovery that time not only has direction—it has mass. It has purpose, probabilities are constraint gated. As with very dense stars or blackholes, the closer you get to the signularity the more your exit optionality collapses to zero. Speaking to the same (mass), 24 March 2030 seems to be that singularity; the day counts that orbit it are essentially rings stretching out to the event horizon; Israel's re-emergence in 1948. The point at which the constraints are most narrow (each successive seal--and most especially each point in the diamond chiasm starting with 25th August 2021) are points at which all history flows into a single definite stream; with Rosh Hoshana 2026 being the final gate; the point of no return--where no amount of velocity can create escape optionality. All of which is specifically aimed at a dinner reservation on 03/04 April (14 Nisan) 2034; a Passover Seder. However, prior to that is the realization that if humanity had it’s way, this last generation of humans would be perhaps the last generation of non-augmented people; with everyone thereafter being augmented via neural link to artificial super intelligence. Not unlike how most people today have a phone of some kind. The notion that root access to the human psyche is achieved and becomes the norm should be terrifying. The fact that all these convergences align around this ought to be even more chilling. It speaks to the weight of transgression this represents.
All in all the closed nature of the system we’ve mapped over the course of the last year is such that it doesn’t say maybe this or that will happen. Rather it says for certain what hasn’t yet happened will be observed because what was due has mapped out, what is left is confirmed by the chiasm which is itself confirmed by 3 astronomical phenoma bound by orbital mechanic; a solar eclipse, a meteor shower immediately following that—and a lunar eclipse; it’s not static prediction of the future it’s a dynamic system with elements already observed and future states mathematically observable and verifiable in the present. The Seder date is certain; the textual logic plus Jesus’ statement about it checksums the entire framework. His death, and our game theory validation of the resurrection account plus the fulfillment of the spring feasts provide historical anchoring for this assessment. All of this fitting in Daniel’s 70 week chronology firms up the holographic structure of the entire system. It’s now just a matter of buckling up for the ride to it—and eventually taking a seat at the table. A dinner date that sophisticated is certainly well worth the wait and discipline. Who’d say no to that sort of state dinner?
I’ve already said a lot and at this point run the risk of excessively belaboring the point. However, it’s important enough that I’ll do so regardless. What we’ve been studying demonstrates that the Hebrew and New Testament Scriptures operate like a cryptographic public key with regards to eschatological text. The temporal dislocation we discovered in the eschaton/singularity essay—and explored further in the coincidence stack operates like a decryption key; with observational information being produced through the last 80 years that now makes the entire informational stack unlock and become discernible—visible, more importantly; testable. The outcome is an empirical object that is self referential. It proves that the source text (the public key) is authored from outside of time. The observation authenticates the public key; and the public key authenticates the observation; and both are real and testable. The implications of this are paradigm shifting. This is observable evidence of the Logos.
If all of this sounds out there—that’s because it is. Nevertheless, the threshold has been crossed; in 2025 we worked through a lot of this content and it’s now public record. Either it hashes in public or it doesn’t—the math, history and astronomy says it does because it’s already doing so.
What have I learned? I've learned that the frontier of what's knowable and learnable is so much more vast than I could have guessed. If what I’ve described here is correct, and the burden of evidence demonstrates to indeed be the case—then what we have been observing as a civilizational dislocation since 1945–is actually the outcomes of a transcendent person opening the seals of the scroll described in Revelation 5 through to 7. We are observers of actions taking place in reality across dimensions. On the one hand it suggests that time operates at vastly different “speeds” depending on what plane of existence on exists in; on the other it demonstrates how a truly eternal being operates in history. It’s all so very perceptible and yet so lofty at the same time. Truly mind blowing.
Looking forward to a year of exploring the frontier and sharing what's found there. In the meantime, buckle up.
All the best.
Post Script:
There's a lot here, if you have questions--reach out to me on Twitter or leave a comment here. Alternatively, you could join this whatsapp group and join the conversation there: https://chat.whatsapp.com/CGMhPDe40loKthS5VdLQPr
